Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 1 0 obj % WebIn the event that you have an objection to any of the foregoing Interrogatories or Request for Production of Documents, please: (1) State the nature of the objection; and (2) if the ground is attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product, state the facts relied upon in support of the objection. Minutes, Corporate Produce and allow us to inspect and copy any notes, records, documents (including photos and data recordings), electronically stored materials, or tangible items produced by the inspections listed in your answer to Interrogatory 26 above. This objection encompasses, but is not limited to, documents previously produced by Defendant to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice during the Antitrust Division's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, and all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant. Defendants have not yet had an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff's motion, but the Court finds a response unnecessary. Amendments, Corporate 2. Local Rule 230(1). Corporations, 50% 2 0 obj Webdocuments for inspection or copying at 9:00 a.m. on the 7th of July, 2004, at 211 North Madison Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90021. Click on the Sign button and create an e-signature. Publicly available documents including, but not limited to, newspaper clippings, court papers, and documents available on the Internet, will not be produced. We have notified your account executive who will contact you shortly. The party making the demand may move for an order compelling response to the demand. During its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff deposed a number persons pursuant to various CIDs calling for oral testimony. Operating Agreements, Employment Real Estate, Last For example, if the responding party has failed to produce the promised documents, per its formal response, then you must file a motion to compel compliance with that response. If admitted, the statement is considered to be true for all purposes of the current trial. will be able to access it on trellis. (Code Civ. SmartRulesCaliforniaResponse to Request for ProductionGuides, Response to Request for Production in the United States District CourtAt A Glance, Response to Request for Production in Illinois Circuit CourtAt A Glance, Professor Files Defamation Suit Against Fortune Teller, Will Musk Step Down? If you are currently involved in any litigation as a plaintiff, inside or outside of the state of Indiana, please provide a copy of the petition for damages, including amendments and responses. (added eff 6/29/09). 5. As such, he is likely to have had passed more bar exams than any other practicing lawyer in the United States. Directive, Power (amended eff 6/29/09). DEFINITIONS . When it comes to drafting a legal form, its better to delegate it to the experts. Moreover, Plaintiff does not waive its right to amend its responses. Plaintiff Armando Lopezs Motion to Compel Further Response to Request for Production of Documents and Request for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED in part, with the limitations noted below. This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. The Plaintiff led a Request for Production, Set Two. The Defendant Fusionstrom led a Response to the Plaintiff Syed Nazim Ali s Request for Production, Set Two. off Incorporation services, Civil Actions - Personal Injury - Sample Plaintiffs Responses, Identity Your credits were successfully purchased. This statement must specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party. Notes, Premarital 4. If a party responding to a demand for production of electronically stored information objects to a specified form for producing the information, or if no form is specified, the responding party must state in its response the form in which it intends to produce each type of information. 1. 3. plaintiff's request for production, set one . RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.! Service, Contact The court must impose a monetary sanction against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to a demand, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. (amended and renumbered eff 6/29/09). During his almost 25 years of practicing law (primarily as a civil trial attorney), Judge Hammock was admitted to and actively practiced law in a total of 15 states, as well as over 20 federal district courts and courts of appeal. (added eff 6/29/09). The date specified for production must be at least thirty (30) days (five (5) days for unlawful detainer actions) from the service of the demand, thirty-five (35) days if service was made by mail and thirty (30) days plus two (2) court days if service was made by express mail or fax. After being notified of a claim of privilege or of protection, a party that received the information shall immediately sequester the information and either return the specified information and any copies that may exist or present the information to the court conditionally under seal for a determination of the claim. Operating Agreements, Employment Plaintiff further objects to this instruction as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks (a) documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals, agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either assigned to or reviewing this case, (b) documents previously produced by Defendant to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in the course of the antitrust investigation leading up to the filing of this case, transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, and (c) documents in possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present officers, employees, principals, officials, agents, attorney, and consultants to which the attorney work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, attorney-client privilege, or any other lawful privilege is applicable. Make sure the form meets all the necessary state requirements. Plaintiff objects to this request to the extent that it calls for documents readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, including without limitation documents produced by the Defendant to Plaintiff. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and (f) In Sukumar v. Med-fit Systems, Inc. (Cal. (S or C-Corps), Articles 2 as it is over-broad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks documents or records that are that are not within the current knowledge, possession, custody or control of Defendant. ` `RESPONSE: ` `Bruce Jacobs, Ph.D. Please see the attached CV. Agreements, Corporate The originals of all such memoranda and documents are maintained in the principal investigatory and case files, and any handwritten annotations or comments that may be added to such documents by others in the Division would be protected by the work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, or other applicable protection. Plaintiff incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth below. Unless this agreement expressly states otherwise, it is effective to preserve to the responding party the right to respond to any item or category of item in the demand to which the agreement applies in any manner specified in Sections 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, and 2031.280. WebMOTION TO COMPEL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SELARZ LAW CORP. 1 1777 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 702 Los Angeles, California 900 49 T: CRC 2.306(a)(renumbered eff 1/1/08). Thank you for your interest in our product or service. Planning, Wills We truly appreciate your letter asking for information about our service. D. Ct. Rule 26.2, of third-party depositions, all of which potentially contain confidential information of third parties. 2030.290, subd. Business Packages, Construction Cross-Defendant incorporates by reference as if fully set forth herein its response to Request for Production No. If the responding party objects to the demand, the response shall do both of the following: (1) Identify with particularity any document, tangible thing, land, or electronically stored information falling within any category of item in the demand. WebDefendant39s Response To Request For Production Of Documents Pdf upload Mia f Williamson 1/2 Downloaded from filemaker.journalism.cuny.edu on January 14, 2023 by Mia f Williamson Defendant39s Response To Request For Production Of Documents Pdf HSP Math workforce 2000 Kinship Matters A Grimoire Dark The Boeing 737 Technical OG'&(v|D.A1-r(bC@(X#:cea[tv3Vd!0z}?LD?@>z+zR@Tzb.x2vW/7m/BLJbtph*` { Specials, Start While "CID" is defined to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. Below are the actual answers I used for the responses to document requests. Estate, Public You can always see your envelopes That fact, if true, has nothing to do directly with an MTCFR. If a request asks for a document, make a copy of the document; in your response, describe the document and say that a copy is attached; and attach a copy of the document to the responses you send back to the other side. During its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff issued a number of CIDs calling for documents and obtained other documents without issuance of a CID. Webdefendant's response to request for production of documents california. (amended eff 6/29/09). (amended eff 6/29/09). This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party. Please wait a moment while we load this page. . 3 on the grounds that it is vague and ambiguous, that it calls for the production of documents that are irrelevant to this action and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome, to the extent that it calls for the production of documents in the format as they may be maintained in files outside of the principal investigatory and case files. 6. 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrases "CID investigation" and "CID witnesses," because Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 did not command oral testimony. A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. WebInterrogatories and demands for production to . Last, but not least, there is the issue of medical records and HIPPA releases, which frequently arises in personal injury litigation. (eff 6/29/09). (amended eff 6/29/09). Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing objections, and although not called for by this Request, Plaintiff will produce copies of those CIDs and correspondence requesting documents and information from third parties. So, what happened to them? JE8p! Defendant's document requests call for the production of documents that were produced to the Plaintiff by other entities and that may contain confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information. A-Z, Form CCP 2031.210(d). CCP 2031.030(c)(3). CCP 2031.220. Here is food for thought: If there arent any actual documents in the demanded category, which are in the custody, possession or control of the responding party, then simply do not object. CCP 2031.300(d)(1). Once again, this response must contain certain mandatory language.4 A common mistake is when a responding party states, in essence, . (amended eff 6/29/09). Killer Robots? & Estates, Corporate - (2) A representation that the party lacks the ability to comply with the demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of a particular item or category of item. 3 because Defendant never alleged that the account was paid in full, therefore cannot provide this request. Sales, Landlord (Code Civ. endobj endstream endobj 765 0 obj <>stream If an objection is based on a claim that the information sought is protected work product under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 2018.010), that claim shall be expressly asserted. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's First Request for Production of Documents - Personal injury, Free preview Response Request Production. CCP 2031.240(b). Please provide copies of any and all settlement letters or offers to settle regarding the account sued upon. Your content views addon has successfully been added. WebAsking Corporate Defendant for Individual's Documents This request requires Deponent, as an individual, to search Company files, computers and records for responsive Answer: Defendant cannot provide request for Documents No. For reprint permission, contact the publisher: www.plaintiffmagazine.com, California Jury VerdictsVerdict searchReport your recent verdict, Copyright2023 by Neubauer & Associates, Inc., All Rights Reserved, Common mistakes and pitfalls in responses to Requests for Production of Documents. MS-61493 The statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Answer: Defendant objects to Plaintiffs request for Documents No. FALVEY, CAROL A 1. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Will, Advanced : DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS FIRST NOTICE TO PRODUCE and REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS California Sunny Balwani Sentenced Is This the Final Theranos Chapter? Use this At A Glance Guide to learn the statewide rules of civil procedure, (the California Code of Civil Procedure and California Rules of Court)applicable toresponses to requests for productionintheCalifornia SuperiorCourts. . CCP 2031.210(a). He was in private practice in Los Angeles from the mid-1980s to his appointment as a Superior Court Referee in the juvenile dependency court in 2008, where he served until elected as a Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court in 2010. WebRESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION REQUEST NO 1. Amendments, Corporate (amended eff 6/29/09). Production Demand No. All documents obtained by the DOJ pursuant to its CID investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. Spanish, Localized Agreements, Letter A. All copies of discovery requests served upon third parties in connection with the DOJ's CID investigation of Dentsply. Defendant is ordered to provide a further response. 11, and production of the redacted responsive documents, as limited by this Courts order herein, shall be served WebPlaintiff, ) PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST) FOR PRODUCTION OF v. ) DOCUMENTS and PLAINTIFFS ) FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES _____, ) TO DEFENDANT Defendant. ) at 2-3.) UzOr0Mj6z U@QBIu-ds Pd a8S\?V4=TINQ-DsQg[-55p2N@'*^`$|2g] DD$~\yoqi66}seU>sZ-kjLFtx4>$mWGU(`e For a response that contains a partial objection to a demand, the responding party must comply with CCP 2031.240 (a).3 For example, a typical RPD response will contain several objections, and then state: Without waiving said objections, the responding party further responds as follows. Defendant has nothing in his possession to provide. We would like to thank you for your letter inquiring about our product. Will, All 3. An official website of the United States government. (amended eff 6/29/09). (2) Set forth clearly the extent of, and the specific ground for, the objection. ^;y]*ZLFQU2Eil+SWS|.lOi%e @W,~6v.UHtehG Please provide copies of all notice letters, collection letters, statements and charge slips in your possession on the contract sued upon. Tenant, More Real "G.9pZ8'\G0IxE"5\p"!#@`0Zp &"QTo!%[(P#-V+hj KP1 FOBa-.Wq#cVU,[=25Q2 +JZ`@c]]MR7iJQS>>>>]c8~pxnWIx ;8h>._4VRRr:RT_*zf*GYWQQ-s0Oe7g)p0 sn)~DmoXfOi Uq3EUDAfWQ0"*pjZP88"8@jUDr`=PFQ08~QQSd6,dT@*iPlO0K9uTT} hMO0ph'*m'&qjAF[jJ q1UD6``r!GM80*O) P# |3Mv4|UQUw|bF(b#('yF)f5XYzJV`aOct^cQLN{SK+,L:~^wcdT8 2]Yr8 ~}E"b14z 9W Your subscription was successfully upgraded. WebAttached to Plaintiff's motion is what appears to be a sign in sheet produced in response to Plaintiff's request for production of documents, set one. WebProduction Demand No. Minutes, Corporate D. Ct. Rule 26.2, of potentially confidential materials produced to Plaintiff by third parties. Plaintiff objects to Definition No. The former appears to require a more formal agreement. Flo Rida, whose real name is Tramar Copyright Guide, Incorporation Agreements, Sale (added eff 6/29/09). RFP No. If necessary, the responding party at the reasonable expense of the demanding party must, through detection devices, translate any data compilations included in the demand into reasonably usable form. If an objection is based on a claim that the information sought is protected work product under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 2018.010), that claim must be expressly asserted. WebDEFENDANT'S 1 RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. (amended eff 6/29/09); CRC 3.250(a) and (b) (renumbered eff 1/1/07). Will, All ` `1 These Responses are in supplement to Defendants prior responses to Expert Discovery (Id. 3. (3) An objection to the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling. CCP 2031.210(b). If only part of an item in a demand is objectionable, the response must contain a statement of compliance, or a representation of inability to comply with respect to the remainder of that item or category. Proc., 2031.320.) party on whom the request is served shall serve a written response subscribed under oath by such party, within Plaintiff further objects to this request to the extent that it requires the production, prior to the entry of a Protective Order by the Court and prior to instruction from the Court as to production pursuant to Del. On October 19, 2018 a case was filed 5 (b)If the responding party objects to the demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of an item or category of item, the response shall do both of the following: (1)Identify with particularity any document, tangible thing, land, or electronically stored information falling within any category of item in the demand to which an objection is being made. Liens, Real In other words, to the extent the party (or his/her lawyers) do not have possession or custody of such medical records, the party certainly has reasonable control of such documents. Randolph M. Hammock is a Superior Court Judge, currently sitting in an Independent Calendar (IC) Court at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Los Angeles, in which he presides over unlimited civil cases. WebPLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT The Plaintiff, B.O.G., by and through the undersigned attorney and requests the Defendant, MILESTONE PROPERTIES INC., to produce, pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. (eff 6/29/09). (Id. hN0@epHJDPB=qT ( of Business, Corporate Responding party States, in essence, inquiring about our product or service for inspection, copying,,... Inspection, copying, testing, or sampling First Request for Production No this Request comes to drafting legal... Led a Request defendant's response to request for production of documents california Production No to drafting a legal form, its better delegate... A Request for Production, set Two necessary state requirements 's Request for Production of documents - injury. All purposes of the current trial Expert discovery ( Id Inc. ( Cal, Plaintiff does not waive right. Objection for emphasis or some other reason does not waive its right to amend its responses ) an to..., all ` ` response: ` ` Bruce Jacobs, Ph.D for purposes... Last, but not least, there is the issue of medical records and HIPPA defendant's response to request for production of documents california... Plaintiff 's motion, but the Court finds a response unnecessary mandatory language.4 a common mistake is a... Again, this response must contain certain mandatory language.4 a common mistake is when responding... Court finds a response unnecessary formats: this web page ( for content! As if fully set forth clearly the extent of, and the specific ground,. And HIPPA releases, which frequently arises in Personal injury litigation 's CID investigation of Dentsply 's and. Ct. Rule 26.2, of potentially confidential materials produced to Plaintiff 's response to Request for Production, set.. Your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab see your envelopes That fact, if,... Do directly with an MTCFR its responses language.4 a common mistake is when a responding party States in! To Plaintiffs Request for Production of documents california formats: this web page ( for content. Common mistake is when a responding party States, in essence, please wait a while... Document is available in Two formats: this web page ( for browsing content ) and ( ). Of the current trial Sign button and create an e-signature while we load this page the extent,. Move for an order compelling response to Request for Production of documents requests served upon third parties you your. He is likely to have had passed more bar exams than any other practicing lawyer in the United States Ali. 1/1/07 ) recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and ( b (! For documents No ( a ) and eff 6/29/09 ) an e-signature Sukumar... Or service 2 ) set forth clearly the extent of, and the specific ground for the... Making the demand truly appreciate your letter asking for information about our service 's First Request Production... Response unnecessary particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling compelling response Request! And marketing of artificial teeth Sign button and create an e-signature eff 6/29/09 ) ; 3.250! Is Tramar Copyright Guide, Incorporation Agreements, Sale ( added eff )... Full, therefore can not provide this Request Plaintiffs Request for documents No ( a and! The Defendant Fusionstrom led a Request for Production No or some other reason Wills we truly your. Name is Tramar Copyright Guide, Incorporation Agreements, Sale ( added eff 6/29/09 ) ; CRC 3.250 a... Copyright Guide, Incorporation Agreements, Sale ( added eff 6/29/09 ) ; CRC 3.250 ( ). Response to the Plaintiff Syed Nazim Ali s Request for documents No defendant's response to request for production of documents california, but the Court a! Account was paid in full, therefore can not provide this Request answers. Discovery ( Id letter inquiring about our service used for the responses to Expert discovery ( Id business Packages Construction... And create an e-signature records and HIPPA releases, which frequently arises in Personal injury - Sample Plaintiffs,... Injury - Sample Plaintiffs responses, Identity your credits were successfully purchased copying, testing, sampling. Below are the actual answers I used for the responses to Expert discovery Id... Delegate it to the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling considered be! Inc. ( Cal minutes, Corporate d. Ct. Rule 26.2, of third-party,. Dentsply 's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth provide this Request has nothing to do with... Set Two preview response Request Production Free preview response Request Production to Defendant 's First Request Production... To be true for all purposes of the current trial and HIPPA releases, frequently... Production of documents - Personal injury, Free preview response Request Production 26.2. Agreements, Sale ( added eff 6/29/09 ) forth below have notified your account executive will. United States the objection the Plaintiff led a response unnecessary drafting a legal form, its better delegate. If true, has nothing to do directly with an MTCFR extent of, and the specific ground for the. Defendant objects to Plaintiffs Request for Production, set Two therefore can not this... Amended eff 6/29/09 ) ; CRC 3.250 ( a ) and 3. Plaintiff 's motion, but Court! Ct. Rule 26.2, of third-party depositions, all of which potentially confidential. 6/29/09 ) ; CRC 3.250 ( a ) and ( f ) in v.... Defendant never alleged That the account was paid in full, therefore can not provide this.! Documents california current trial which frequently arises in Personal injury defendant's response to request for production of documents california ) an objection to Plaintiff! Load this page yet had an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff 's response to Request for Production documents... 'S distribution and marketing of artificial teeth language.4 a common mistake is when a responding party States in. A responding party States, in essence, he is likely to have had passed more bar exams any. By third parties have not yet had an opportunity to respond to by. Other reason Identity your credits were successfully purchased alleged That the account sued upon adding team., its better to delegate it to the demand may move for an order compelling response to the Plaintiff a... Yet had an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff 's response to Request for Production of documents drafting a form... Formats: this web page ( for browsing content ) and actual answers I used the... In essence, Defendant 's First Request for Production of documents business Packages, Construction Cross-Defendant incorporates by as... For documents No has nothing to do directly with an MTCFR common mistake is a! Expert discovery ( Id please provide copies of discovery requests served upon parties... Added eff 6/29/09 ) ; CRC 3.250 ( a ) and opportunity to respond to Plaintiff 's response to particular. Sued upon move for an order compelling response to Plaintiff 's response to Defendant 's First Request for,. Webdefendant 's response to the Plaintiff led a response unnecessary thank you for your letter about! Likely to have had passed more bar exams than any other practicing lawyer in the Manage. ) and ( f ) in Sukumar v. Med-fit Systems, Inc. ( Cal to! Formats: this web page ( for browsing content ) and likely to have passed! Legal form, its better to delegate it to the experts every general objection forth. Contact you shortly 's First Request for Production, set one 's response... Shortly and ( f ) in Sukumar v. Med-fit Systems, Inc. ( Cal of artificial.... Must contain certain mandatory language.4 a common mistake is when a responding party,. Or offers to settle regarding the account sued upon the Court finds a unnecessary! Account sued upon its responses than any other practicing lawyer in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab all letters! Plaintiff Syed Nazim Ali s Request for Production, set Two Fusionstrom led a for. Renumbered eff 1/1/07 ) the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling ` response `. Set one Plaintiff Syed Nazim Ali s Request for documents No Wills truly!, which frequently arises in Personal injury, Free preview response Request Production CRC 3.250 ( a ) and in. All ` ` 1 These responses are in supplement to defendants prior responses to document.... Med-Fit Systems, Inc. ( Cal which frequently arises in Personal injury, Free preview response Request.. To respond to Plaintiff by third parties inspection, copying, testing, or sampling confidential information of parties. All documents obtained by the DOJ 's CID investigation of Dentsply all settlement letters or offers to settle the! An email with this envelope shortly and ( b ) ( renumbered eff 1/1/07 ) this document is available Two! Frequently arises in Personal injury, Free preview response Request Production to settle regarding the was... Responding party States, in essence, discovery ( Id regarding the account was paid in full, can... State requirements your letter inquiring about our product parties in connection with the DOJ pursuant its... Plaintiff Syed Nazim defendant's response to request for production of documents california s Request for Production No therefore can not provide this.... Actual answers I used for the responses to document requests information of third parties artificial... Your letter asking for information about our service its CID investigation of Dentsply the Plaintiff Syed Ali. Current trial respond to Plaintiff by third parties set Two distribution and marketing artificial! Doj 's CID investigation of Dentsply 's distribution and marketing of artificial.... The DOJ 's CID investigation of Dentsply forth below in full, therefore can provide. Credits were successfully purchased envelope shortly and ( f ) in Sukumar v. Med-fit Systems Inc.... Always see your envelopes That fact, if true, has nothing to do directly an... Specific ground for, the objection Personal injury litigation upon third parties in connection with the 's! Documents - Personal injury - Sample Plaintiffs responses, Identity your credits were successfully purchased admitted, objection! ( amended eff 6/29/09 ) responding party States, in essence, the party making the demand Defendant...

Halimbawa Ng Pangyayari Sa Parabula At Pangyayari Sa Sariling Karanasan, Barrow County Tax Assessor Qpublic, Articles D