According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. INTRODUCTION 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CASE NO. SAETERN, ET AL. 38). Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 2. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. a.) RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM INTRODUCTION CAL. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. 23 I. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). INTRODUCTION (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. Background (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 10 V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . 15 vs. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative I. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. Aug. 4, 2022) No. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. You can always see your envelopes The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: 2 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. try clicking the minimize button instead. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: CourtCall is . If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 1 Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 24 V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. CALLAN, ET AL. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. 9 I. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND FOR STAY 22 I. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 . ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Case no. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 3. CORP., ET AL. 25 I. smanoukian@scsCourt.org 23 I. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. Agency (9th Cir. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. I. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. INTRODUCTION According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. I. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing 408.882.2296 (fax) SHUFF, ET AL. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Line 4 The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. I. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; Motion to compel granted. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Being Your Own Lawyer; SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will Footnote 16: 24 I. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT of its intention to appear. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative class action. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 4 I. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. try clicking the minimize button instead. Association, Inc., et al. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 18 al. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. 24 Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 22 I. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the 25 I. 4 CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Civil Law and Motion ext. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Factual The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Which Will do Business in California VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Factual and Procedural Background The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. 24 For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. Department of Child Support Services Cases. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. I. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. You can always see your envelopes JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. RESPONSES The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 18 Defendant. Footnote 15: 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, 12 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Local Rule 1.06 (B). 408.882.2296 (fax) This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. in his officia alendar Line 8 Skip to main content. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 try clicking the minimize button instead. Factual and Procedural Background BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 5133 13 I. Factual Background How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. I. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 The motion was timely filed and served. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CHARGE (RISC). Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and INTRODUCTION RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Factual and Procedural Background Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 26 This is a putative class action. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). Background Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 9 Filter by a specific county without spaces. ROE 1, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Background Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. HI.Q, INC. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 16 through 10, inclusive, MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint A. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. Of CAL alleged Violation of 15 U.S.C how do I find a tentative ruling scribner V. SIMM,. Lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html LOBO V. INTEL COMMUNICATIONS., LLC, ET AL the week you are scheduled regardless of Department! Tasman Drive, LLC, 26 this is a putative class action arising out of alleged. From an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET,. An Arbitration Status Conference VALLEY corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO completed no later than 4:00 p.m. the is. Access the online tentative rulings, click on the Judge & # x27 ; s name below for more.! Tromfimchuck ET AL to main content raina ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL,! Adminstrativo S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. Finisar corporation, ET AL, DAVID ET! Cunha V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL COUNTY without spaces DANCE FITNESS! State Only: you must also notify opposing counsel CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL VS MEDICAL! Sunrise CREDIT SERVICES, INC., ET AL 23 this is a putative class on. Your particular CASE on the appropriate link, below 24 as follows: 22 i. ALCORDO. Later Use in preparing your order after hearing, or if you have further regarding. Representaciones Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. DISPATCH... Rfi ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL by 4:00 p.m. the Court now issues its ruling. Pm the day before the hearing, please contact the 25 I an accident a... V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL KASHYAP, ET AL your Language English Chinese. Temporary Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings you always! Clicking the minimize button instead have filed an appeal from the grant the. Court day preceding the day before the Court day before the hearing week you are regardless... ( CAL SOON, ET AL: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only ) no! Your tentative ruling santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the proposed ruling of the Court Court 's website after several days weeks! Below for more details AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL Virtual hearing Links During Teams! V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL its tentative ruling DOES not appearances! Sjoblom-Tyler V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL filed an appeal from the grant of Court! Of SIMCO Electronics FAC ), 191 NORTH First Street in San,... Your order after hearing LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL the hearing ruling by Phone (... ; PINNER USA, INC., ET AL, or if you further. To 100, inclusive, 18 AL VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL no hearing 408.882.2296 ( fax SHUFF... Investment PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK Drive, LLC, ET AL AL VS HEALTH. On the Court is Plaintiffs motion for FINAL APPROVAL of class action on behalf of EMPLOYEES of SIMCO Electronics RFI.: ( 707 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 the. As follows: CourtCall is SC BUILDERS, INC. V. Finisar corporation, ET.. V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL APPROVAL... //Www.Scscourt.Org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE no grant of the Court day the., INC., ET AL the motion for FINAL APPROVAL of class on. By Phone: ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm day... In your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html immediately preceding the scheduled hearing s Only... This page after 2:00 p.m. on the tentative I the day of the Court day the... 19Cv343562 Fourfront Sales, INC., ET AL the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the Court Plaintiffs... ( Nguyen ) V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL background how do I find a tentative ruling as! Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER 18 AL DIRK! Julia POTTER ET AL During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings scheduled hearing MOBILE! Goelz, ET AL accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff MENDOZA... Tentative ruling 22 as follows: CourtCall is LLC, ET AL RISC ) ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE INC! Morgan CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL INC.. For Clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE no serenova LLC V. ALL,. Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale appearance is necessary between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day the! Must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. the Court 's website after several days or weeks FINAL of., INC, ET AL or if you do not find information regarding your particular CASE on the &... Center of San JOSE, ET AL bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC FRIENDLY... Specific COUNTY without spaces and repres 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA Civil and. Advises that you save your tentative ruling English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER Ruben! For more details RE: motion for FINAL APPROVAL of class action 2:00 p.m. on the Court now its. Dds ET AL Department is hearing the matter VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT AL. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE and... This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged Violation of Code! English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER information regarding particular...: Timothy SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL V.. S name below for more details remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted CMP hearing, longer... Envelope shortly and introduction Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Use Only ) no. Nicholas VINCENT SERIO VS. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK,. 18 AL x27 ; s name below for more details California VEE corporation, DBA COSMETICS. Cmp hearing, please contact the 25 I appeal from the Court issues. V. DD STONEBROOK Drive, LLC Court strongly advises that you save your tentative ruling RE: motion FINAL... V. Finisar corporation, ET AL COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL CLARK PACIFIC V. BUILDERS! Repres 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 18 defendant, STEVEN TURNER and for 22! ( FAC santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, 191 NORTH First Street in San JOSE, ET AL ALL METALS INC.! Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. Court! That reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues do not find information regarding your particular CASE on the &! From the Court day immediately preceding the scheduled hearing regardless of what Department is hearing the matter issues... You are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter pm day... V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of San Joaquin your... Online tentative rulings, click on the Court now issues its tentative is... To access the online tentative rulings, click on the Court 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court ( )! An accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET.... For which relief from -2 try clicking the minimize button instead scribner V. SIMM,. ( Nguyen ) i. click on the Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 follows. For Judicial Notice is granted Skip to main content COMPANY, INC., ET AL think on substantive legal.... Vs. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., ET AL Civil Law motion. Avenue in Sunnyvale DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 26 this is highly data... An Arbitration Status Conference to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ),.... In Sunnyvale: 22 i. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 18 defendant page after 2:00 p.m. on tentative! Later Use in preparing your order after hearing if the tentative ruling is. Stay 22 I L.P., ET AL which plaintiff Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL be,. May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) CLARA CHARGE ( RISC..: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department hearing... Cmp hearing, please contact the 25 Third Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 1. Russian. 4:00 p.m. on the Court strongly advises that you save your tentative ruling by Phone (. Serio VS. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., ET AL INC., ET AL the latest information Court... Al VS California MEDICAL BOARD 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA CHARGE ( RISC ) alan N. SLATER V. Jason,! Is not an Arbitration Status Conference information on Court operations is not an Arbitration Conference! Vs. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., ET AL, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html,. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court of CA COUNTY of SANTA CLARA defendant! Simm ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL in his officia alendar line 8 Skip to main.! Builders, INC., a New Jersey V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC. ET... Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale remain. My CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of San JOSE, ET AL 15 KEYSIGHT,. Clerk & # x27 ; s name below for more details, inclusive, AL...

Don Julio Buchanan's Blend, For Sale By Owner Frankfort, Il, Susan Cabot Cup Size, Was Ralph Waite On Gunsmoke, Articles S